How Sustainable Packaging Shifts Could Impact Your Food Subscription Costs
According to The Hindu, Zomato says sustainable packaging may increase food-delivery costs by 10–30%.

For subscription-box shoppers, that matters because packaging is part of the delivered product: it protects food in transit, affects the unboxing experience, and can influence the final price. The report is a warning about possible cost pressure, not evidence that every food box will immediately become more expensive.
The packaging bill may become more visible
A food subscription is priced as a bundle: ingredients, preparation, shipping, and the box itself. If operators move toward more sustainable packaging, the cost of that outer layer may become easier to notice—especially for chilled, fragile, or portioned products that need several separate containers.
The available reporting does not identify which materials Zomato is assessing, nor does it confirm that a specific subscription service has already passed a 10–30% increase on to customers. That distinction matters. “May cost more” is not the same as a confirmed price rise, and the headline does not establish how the figure would apply to meal kits, snack boxes, or other subscription formats.
Still, packaging is one of the few parts of a box that subscribers can inspect immediately. When I compare food deliveries, I look beyond the printed branding and ask whether the box uses a sensible amount of material, whether individual items are protected, and whether the packaging appears designed for the product rather than added for presentation alone.
Sustainability is becoming a design and operations issue
A report from Sustainable Packaging News describes sustainable materials as one of the developments shaping the 2026 food-manufacturing market. It also notes that foodservice brands are moving beyond the familiar plain kraft look, with some using bolder colours and more distinctive designs to stand out in physical and digital marketplaces.
That creates two separate questions for subscribers. The first is environmental: what is the material, and how should it be handled after delivery? The second is practical: does the packaging preserve the food’s condition without making the box unnecessarily bulky, difficult to open, or awkward to store?
The same report highlights fibre-based packaging in connection with plant-led food brands and mentions materials derived from sugar-cane residue. It also says some brands are working to remove toxic “forever chemicals” from food packaging. Those examples show the direction of the market, but they should not be treated as proof that every box uses the same materials or offers the same environmental performance.
Packaging Gateway separately reports that Zomato has unveiled a tool to help restaurants choose sustainable packaging. For customers, the important point is that packaging decisions may increasingly be made through structured selection tools rather than left entirely to individual restaurants or suppliers.
What to check before subscribing
If packaging costs do rise, the clearest comparison is not simply the monthly price. Check whether the service explains shipping, packaging, and any recurring fee separately, then compare the delivered portion count or item count—not just the headline subscription rate.
Pay attention to the physical details on your first delivery:
- Is the box appropriately sized for its contents?
- Are fragile or temperature-sensitive items protected without excessive layers?
- Can the main materials be separated easily for disposal or recycling?
- Does the service explain what the packaging is made from and how to handle it?
- Is a packaging or sustainability fee clearly disclosed before checkout?
The current evidence does not confirm a blanket increase for subscription boxes. What it does show is a market preparing for more sustainable packaging, with Zomato-linked reporting placing a possible 10–30% cost impact on food deliveries and industry coverage tracking broader material and design changes.
My verdict for subscribers: do not reject a box solely because sustainable packaging could cost more. Instead, judge the build quality of the delivery as part of the subscription’s value. A sturdier, sensibly designed package can justify some added cost when it protects the food and avoids needless waste; an expensive box with vague packaging information deserves closer scrutiny.